🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense debate over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the government pays for the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are highly cognitive mammals – something one caretaker learned personally.

Burgess spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that involved earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She cultivated a special affection for two female belugas with opposing natures.

“Eve selected me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “They changed the way I perceive connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales evolved against a context of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her time at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the park links to expected lifespan, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The park did not open to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not respond to a request for comment, but in the past asserted: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and 24/7 supervision than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in the spring following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the facility thought information of the death were disclosed to the press and she was let go not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the facility’s threat to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any attempts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “immense personnel”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She backs demands for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.

In late September, the nation’s government official rejected a bid to send the whales to China.

“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing existence in confinement and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience approve an transfer that would continue the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a broader lack of awareness of the circumstances of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers work to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a important part of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The prospective location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Others say the idea of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable solution in the near future.

An official, head of the initiative, said the location will simulate the cognitive activities and diet the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|